浪花直播

In 2023, for the first time ever, a majority of the 鈥渋rregular migrant encounters鈥� at the US-Mexico border originated from beyond Mexico and the Northern Triangle.

When it comes to coverage of migration鈥攅specially migration at our southern border鈥擴S media tends to focus solely on the overall numbers. It鈥檚 easy to see why: in Fiscal Year 2023, there were nearly 2.5 million 鈥渋rregular encounters鈥� at the US-Mexico border鈥攖hat鈥檚 US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) terminology for expulsions and apprehensions of migrants. This broke FY2022鈥檚 record of  which, in turn, broke the previous year鈥檚 record of 1.6 million. But the more interesting story is where those migrants are coming from鈥攁nd how quickly it is shifting. 

In 2023, , more than half of those reaching the US-Mexico border originated beyond Mexico and the Northern Triangle countries of Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador. In 2020, according to the Migration Policy Institute鈥檚 analysis of CBP data, only 12% involved migrants from beyond those four countries. 

Many Americans have long assumed that nearly all undocumented migrants reaching the US were Mexican. In fairness, it was and is true that Mexico is the single-largest origin country for such migrants. But in FY2023, Mexican citizens made up only 23% of irregular migrant encounters nationwide. Taken together, the Northern Triangle countries accounted for 500,723 encounters in FY2023. That鈥檚 a 36% drop from FY2021 to roughly 16% of all encounters. 

So where are irregular migrants coming from? The numbers vary by year and depend on external factors like conflict, natural disasters, economic downturns, crime, and political repression. There have been of desperate Cubans fleeing government crackdowns by Castro and his successors. Between 2022 and 2023, nearly 500,000 Cubans submitted asylum applications to the US and Mexico鈥�. There have been  of Haitians trying to escape violence and economic chaos sowed by political instability and . And there have been  of migrants heading to the US-Mexico border from the Northern Triangle driven in large part by economic crises and natural disasters, from  to more powerful  to crime and insecurity. 

But in recent years, migrants are increasingly coming from much further afield. By 2023, Venezuelans fleeing the corruption and mismanagement of the Maduro regime was the second-largest nationality of migrant encounters at the US-Mexico border. The numbers of Peruvians, Colombians, Cubans, and Ecuadorians have also risen as more individuals make the dangerous trek through the 鈥攖he slim stretch of wild jungle between Colombia and Panama. Even more striking is that countries thousands of miles from the border are beginning to contribute material numbers of migrants. In the recent  making its way across Mexico, individuals claimed to hail from 24 different countries, including Iran, Turkey, Syria, and Cameroon. 

The number of asylum seekers from China has also been trending upward since February 2023, with more than 52,000 recorded encounters in FY2023, and an additional 14,000 since the start of the new fiscal year. The US is by far the  for hopeful Chinese asylees, driven by a desire to escape Xi Jinping鈥檚 crackdown on civil society and individual freedoms ranging from expression to religion. We鈥檝e seen a similar uptick in migrants from  following diminishing protections for Christians, Muslims, and Sikhs under Prime Minister Narendra Modi鈥攊n FY2023, nearly 42,000 encounters along the US southern border were Indian nationals, an increase of 128% from FY2022. 

And while encounters from citizens of countries across Africa remain categorized as 鈥渙ther鈥� by the CBP, data analyzed by the New York Times found approximately  from the continent were apprehended at the US-Mexico border in FY2023. With Europe tamping down on irregular migration, including through the recent passage of the EU鈥檚 Pact on Migration and Asylum, more refugees and migrants across the African continent are fleeing to  then trekking to our border on foot.

Why does this shift matter? Some of the policy tools we鈥檝e been using in an attempt to control migration are likely to prove inadequate鈥攕uch as the Partnership for Prosperity/Remain in Mexico policy, where we have repatriation agreements with Mexico and Central American countries. 

I once heard a political leader say that too often we launch fact finding initiatives when we really need fact facing ones. The US and Mexico are grappling with migration and displacement challenges that are, to paraphrase an old automobile ad campaign, 鈥渘ot your father鈥檚鈥� challenges. Not in terms of numbers or countries of origin or root causes. In other words, it鈥檚 time to face the facts, and get to work addressing them.