It was no surprise when the traditional conservatives came out on top in Germany鈥檚 federal election on Sunday. Polls had consistently put them at the top of the multiparty heap in this short-fuse campaign. It was also no surprise when the current Chancellor, Olaf Scholz, paid a high price in voter dissatisfaction. No, the real surprise was finding America being a hot-button issue in the final days of the campaign.
At the start, the election focus was largely domestic: the after-effects of migration from Syria in 2015 and Ukraine in 2022, Germany鈥檚 long-stuttering economy, and unpopular climate change mandates. Elections were held early after Germany鈥檚 three-party coalition broke apart, day after the US elections, over the annual budget. The coalition partners paid the price for voter dissatisfaction: the Social Democratic Party (SPD) was down 9%, the Greens 3%, and the liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP) 7%. The FDP didn鈥檛 even earn enough votes to enter parliament, and its leader Christian Lindner now faces a well-earned leadership challenge. It was a punishing result for all three parties.
But the election took place just a week after the Munich Security Conference ended, where transatlantic controversy began. There, US Vice President Vance questioned Europe鈥檚 commitment to democratic principles, specifically questioning the exclusion of populist parties. 鈥淚f you are running in fear of your own voters,鈥 he said, 鈥渢here is nothing America can do for you.鈥 He argued that shutting people out of the political process was 鈥渢he most surefire way to destroy democracy.鈥 Coupled with his decision to meet separately with the leader of the populist right-wing Alternative for Germany (AfD), German politicians saw the speech as electoral interference. Elon Musk鈥檚 pro-AfD tweets doubled down on the message from America.
It was a message Germany鈥檚 political parties had not expected to hear. In a system where all German governments are coalitions, parties have ruled out working with AfD. Vance鈥檚 words challenged this 鈥渇irewall.鈥
German officials were quick to push back in Munich. But no party leader could leave it at that in the week that followed. Pollsters questioned whether Vance鈥檚 apparent endorsement would help or hurt the AfD; in the end, AfD鈥檚 20,8% of the vote aligned with polling trends throughout the campaign. Anti-American sentiment may have factored into a surprise protest surge for the Left party; badly trailing a few weeks earlier, the successor to the former East German Communist Party landed 8.8% of the vote. The Left surge also appeared to kick its breakaway challenger鈥攖he Sarah Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW)鈥 into the political wilderness at the federal level.
Campaigning in Munich on election eve, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) leader Friedrich Merz told a beer hall full of supporters that Europe鈥攁nd Germany鈥攏eeded to be stronger. In a direct reference to the US shut-out of Europeans from negotiations with Russia, Merz emphasized Europe needed a seat at the table to represent its interests鈥攐pposite Russia, China, and 鈥渨hen necessary鈥 also the United States.
He meant it. In the traditional TV discussion with party leaders just after provisional election results were in, Merz suggested that the US government was largely indifferent to Europe鈥檚 fate. Would it be necessary to establish a swift European defense capability?
The election results point to a new coalition government between Merz鈥檚 CDU and the SPD. Crafting that ideologically-opposed partnership in Merz鈥檚 eight week timeframe might be rocky, and the SPD will have leadership issues following Scholz鈥檚 hefty loss. The parties鈥 views on economic policy diverge. Areas of agreement, however, could be defense spending and Ukraine. Scholz remains proud of swiftly turning around German policy following Russia鈥檚 invasion, as he underscored even while accepting his party鈥檚 loss on Sunday night.
Merz campaigned for a fundamental change of German policy. And while he initially meant economic policy (especially growth and competitiveness), the German-American relationship is also up for a reboot in his new government. What direction will the new government鈥檚 security policy take? Will it head in a more Europe-centric direction? What will that mean for NATO?
The American message in Munich a week ago made German-US relations an unexpectedly divisive German election issue. Germans now question whether their trust in the United States is misplaced. In losing that trust, America also lost something in Germany鈥檚 elections.
Author

Global Europe Program
The Global Europe Program is focused on Europe鈥檚 capabilities, and how it engages on critical global issues. We investigate European approaches to critical global issues. We examine Europe鈥檚 relations with Russia and Eurasia, China and the Indo-Pacific, the Middle East and Africa. Our initiatives include 鈥淯kraine in Europe鈥濃攁n examination of what it will take to make Ukraine鈥檚 European future a reality. But we also examine the role of NATO, the European Union and the OSCE, Europe鈥檚 energy security, transatlantic trade disputes, and challenges to democracy. The Global Europe Program鈥檚 staff, scholars-in-residence, and Global Fellows participate in seminars, policy study groups, and international conferences to provide analytical recommendations to policy makers and the media. Read more
Explore More
Browse Insights & Analysis
